Hi Nigel,
The 16 bit GUI version works fine, send me the test and I will let you
know.

regards

Lee McLaren


Nigel Goodwin wrote:
>
> In message <34D5A7C2.257172EC@trump.net.au>, Lee McLaren
> <lmclaren@TRUMP.NET.AU> writes
> >Lee Mclaren replied:
> >Hi Nigel,
> >The error message I get is "Runtime error 200 at 096C:0091." , I
> believe
> >that I used to get a "Runtime error 200" with pip02 until the update
> as
> >well if this helps.
> >The 32 bit version works ok but I miss the convenience of command
> line
> >parameters and the speed of picprog, In the time it takes to load the
> >32bit version picprog is finished programming!
>
> Hi Lee,
>
> I'll keep this going via the PICLIST for the moment, it may help
> someone
> else - and perhaps someone may have some ideas!.
>
> Firstly, if the 32 bit version works OK, how about the 16 bit windows
> version - does that work OK?. Assuming it does, the problem if likely
> to
> be the Delay() procedure - much of the code for all three versions is
> similar, but they all use different ways of generating their delays.
>
> So let me know if the 16 bit version works, and I'll send you a small
> DOS program to check the Delay() function.
> --
>
> Nigel.
>
> /--------------------------------------------------------------\
>         | Nigel Goodwin   | Internet : nigelg@lpilsley.demon.co.uk
> |
>         | Lower Pilsley   | Web Page : http://www.lpilsley.demon.co.uk
> |
>         | Chesterfield    |
> |
>         | England         |
> |
>
> \--------------------------------------------------------------/