Alan Hall <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU> wrote:

> AN556 suggests that if an interrupt occurs during a table read
> (using addwf ... retlw) then the retlw after the one you wanted may
> be accessed in error. I was told this is fixed, and no need to
> disable interrupts.

Alan:

The only thing that's been "fixed" is the appnote... It has NEVER
been necessary to disable interrupts during table reads; the appnote
was just wrong.

-Andy

=== Andrew Warren - fastfwd@ix.netcom.com
=== Fast Forward Engineering - Vista, California
=== http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/2499