> > John Payson wrote: > > > Note that the 16C84/16F84 may in fact be no easier to break than > > other 16Cxx parts; the big reason it got cracked was the value of > > the broadcast satellite signals. > > Actually, John, the C84 and F84 are a LOT easier to crack than > the others. I should have rephrased that: the others MAY be no more difficult to crack than the 16C84/16F84. There are no WIDELY-KNOWN easy cracks for the OTP chips, and there MAY be no KNOWN easy cracks for them period. But since I am not privy to all that goes into those chips there's no way to say for sure.