At 04:26 PM 12/16/97 -0800, you wrote:
>John Payson <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU> wrote:
>
>> Note that the 16C84/16F84 may in fact be no easier to break than
>> other 16Cxx parts; the big reason it got cracked was the value of
>> the broadcast satellite signals.
>
>    Actually, John, the C84 and F84 are a LOT easier to crack than
>    the others.
>
>    -Andy

Oops! Not so private after all.


>
>=== Andrew Warren - fastfwd@ix.netcom.com
>=== Fast Forward Engineering - Vista, California
>=== http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/2499
>