On Sun, 16 Nov 1997, Robert Nansel wrote:
> To anyone who was inconvenienced by my posting the GIFs of the ultrasonic
> schematics: my apologies. I posted them because of the large number of
> requests I received from other members of the list.
> Perhaps a more constructive way to respond to this issue would be to define
> what is "too large" a file to attach (or if one should attach files at
> all).
> I shall be guided by the collective opinion.
> --BN

A 56K attachment is fine by me. But then I'm using a big unix box
connected to the university 100baseT network. If I was on a 28K baud line
connected to a busy isp it would probably be a different matter. Perhaps
the question should be why was the attachment considered "crap"?

Ron

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Ron Kreymborg                   Computer Systems Manager
 Monash University               CRC for Southern Hemisphere Meteorology
 Wellington Road
 Clayton, VIC 3168               Phone     : 061-3-9905-9671
 Australia                       Fax       : 061-3-9905-9689
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~