At 05:09 PM 28/10/97 PST, Billw wrote:
>Um, I think I missed part of the discussion.  Is Parallax getting fussy
>over basic-stamp-like machines?  They didn't seem too be for a long time
>(to their credit), but perhaps they were entitled.  The 8052-basic was
>an entirely different sort of beast.  The core of PAX's "innovations"
>were twofold:

I apologise for my previous rant.  I'm still pissed at what happened last
week.  PAX got attacked because Walt brought them up.

I'm all right now,

really.

myke