>Thanks for the effort! Could you try it again using the supplied (Hi-Tech)
>I2C lib? (I assume it comes with I2C support)
That would be an incorrect assumption.

> My point was that for $800 I
>expect vastly superior code to be generated _without_ resorting to down
>coding in ASM. ANSI compliance does _not_ justify the price they ask, nice
>tight code generation close to ASM would (Major pipe dream!).
My example was done fully in C (even my I2C stuff)

You can't expect a C compiler to do as well as you do in Assembler because you
 know a lot of stuff
the compiler
doesn't.

--Alan


+---------------------------------------------------------
| Alan G. Smith
| ags@poboxes.com
| http://www.innovatus.com/ags