On 29 Sep 97 at 19:03, Andy Kunz wrote:

<big snip>

> Here's what I mean:
>
> I owned the CCS compiler for ~5-6 months.  During that time I was
> able to complete 1 project with it for shipment (and to do so I had
> to write my own PRINTF function in assembly because CCS didn't yet
> support 16-bit values in PRINTF).  Since late August (I got one of
> the initial releases of HiTech's compiler) I have delivered 3
> projects using HiTech.
>
> I have since gone back and changed the other app into HiTech code.
> No assembly was required.  What else can I say.
>

Here's a real quick question which hasn't been touched - when you
re-compiled the CCS app into HiTech, which was most space-efficient,
and could you give an idea of the relative sizes? (rom & ram)  I've
seen some reasonable '1 page' code/ram apps blow way out when you
exceed one page.
MikeS
<mikesmith_ozNOSP*M.relaymail.net>
(remove the you know what before replying)