You are, of course, correct, but I have a question.  Does your code always
use the same # of cycles, I am confused about how the PIC handles a long
sequence of 2 byte instructions like this.  If it is, is this why you chose
goto    $+2 for the first goto instead of goto $+4?

CIAO - Martin R. Green
elimar@bigfoot.com

----------
From:   KLAMS10/KLAMS100/XH01G6 on behalf of Mark
Langezaal[SMTP:mlangezaal@KLM.NL]
Sent:   Monday, September 22, 1997 5:54 AM
To:     'PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU'
Subject:        RE: Multi-byte counter trick
Importance:     High

Dmitry Kiryashov wrote:

>Hello Piclister members !
>
> I am sure that I am not first discover of this but it's greate !
> PIC have nice ability to implement normal multi-byte counters .
> Look at example below . (Let it will 3 byte incrementing)
> ---
>        incfsz  low,f
>        skpnz
>        incfsz  medium,f
>        skpnz
>        incf    high,f
>---
>Last instruction is INCF not INCFSZ .
>Execution time is always equal to 7 clocks !
>
>So any n-byte inc/dec operation have execution time equal to: 1+(n-1)*3
>And previous carry flag not corrupted .
>
>WBR Dmitry.

Unfortunately this code will NOT work as you might expect!
When you read the pic manual carefully you will see that the incfsz
instruction does NOT modify the status register, and so will not set or
clear the Z flag.
Don't ask me how I found this out...

If the above routine is called with the Z flag set, then the files medium
and high are ALWAYS incremented.

However, If you change your code to:

        incfsz  low,f
        goto    $+2
        incfsz  medium,f
        goto    $+2
        incf    high,f

then it will work.

Mark Langezaal