On 17 Sep 97 at 9:22, Aydin Yesildirek wrote:

> What if you get another INT within "do isr"? The second
> "save RP0 to RP1" might hurt you.

Well, going into the isr disables the gie bit, so unless you enable
it you won't get interrupts inside the isr.
If you *did* enable gie inside the isr, you'd also run the very real
risk of a stack overflow.  I'm not sure why you would do this - do
you have an app that allows for recursive interrupts?
MikeS
<mikesmith_oz@nosp*m.relaymail.net>
(remove the you know what before replying)