Hi Mike, How about a PIC that moniters the horiz and vert sync, and simply inserts its own signal into the video? Basically the psuedo code might be the following: 1. check if vertical sync detected 2. if not detected, go to 1 3. check if horiz sync detected 4. increment counter 5. go to 3 unless counter is on the line where the ID image begins. 6. draw first line of image at appropriate moment 7. wait for horiz pulse 8. draw line of image 9. increment image line counter 10. go to 7, except when all ID lines done. 11. go to 1 You could also have a "fader" I/O line on the PIC that changes the output signal level, so the ID image has a nice, somewhat fast "fade" effect when it comes and leaves the screen. About the storage, it might be easier to store it 8x64, because the PIC might not be fast enough to get an acceptable horizontal resolution. Hope this helps, Eric ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: Re: VGA Moniters Author: Mike Keitz at INTERNET Date: 9/10/97 12:48 AM On Tue, 9 Sep 1997 08:38:28 -0700 ERIC SCHLAEPFER writes: > Hello All, > > A while back there was a thread about connecting a computer >moniter to > a PIC controller. Well, I was intrigued, so I decided to see if >this > could be done. > > The final version displays some numbers(albeit static) on the >screen > in a surprisingly crisp and noise-free manner. The resolution is >about > 25x370. I'm in the very preliminary stages of building a PIC circuit as part of my amateur TV transmitter (which is also in the very preliminary stages). The PIC will lock to the incoming signal and periodically overlay station ID on the picture. I'm looking at using a bitmap of 64 x 8 pixels stored in the EEPROM of a 16F84, stretching the pixels vertically by repeating each line 4 times or so. Using a PIC clock of 12 MHz, and 2 instruction cycles per pixel, the 64 pixels should fit in the viewable area of the screen. Also the PIC would generate an "early" horizontal pulse to boost the voltage to the RF power amplifier though this could be done rather readily with analog circuitry if need be. The PIC clock needs to synchronize to the incoming video, I was planning to do that by using software to compare the sync pulses with the state of the program, and output pulses to a varicap diode that adjusts the frequency of the PIC oscillator. Anyone tried this before? Just synchronizing the software will let the text jitter (maybe slowly, maybe quickly) one pixel or so back and forth. Also a custom crystal would be required. So I'd really like to synchronize the oscillator itself. (As a note, most TV's that display stuff onscreen have two oscillators in the TV controller microprocessor, one is a crystal that runs all the time and the other is LC. The LC oscillator is started exactly in phase for each line by a horizontal pulse and clocks the pixels out for that line. Doesn't seem too practical to use this kind of design with a PIC though maybe something along these lines could be done with the USART or SSP) > > I had to calculate the timings based on the fact that the '84 at >4mHz > runs at about one microsecond per instruction,(two for jumps) and >that > the MDA scan rates are 18.432 kHz horizontal, 50Hz vertical. 4mHz >is > just about the bare minimum to display legible numerals on the > display; at least with these refresh rates. > > If anyone is interested in the circuit diagram and program source > code, feel free to email me and I will send them to you. > > Eric Schlaepfer > > P.S. Off Topic: does anyone know what could be wrong with my >broken > moniter? I think it is a fuse because the power light doesn't >come on > when I flip the switch. Also, when the thing broke there was no >smoke > or that nasty electrical burning smell. Probably you applied an incorrect (too low frequency or wrong duty cycle) horizontal drive signal. This causes various inductors to saturate and make too much current flow in the horizontal output transistor, burning it out. They nearly always fail shorted, thus causing the fuse to blow and the pilot light to go out. I suppose it's conceiveable that the excess current could just blow the fuse and the transistor is OK, but it doesn't seem likely. Many MDA monitors (including the original IBM one) are susceptible to damage this way because they apply the horizontal pulses from the video cable directly to the horizontal output circuit. Every other type of monitor uses a PLL oscillator which is certain to drive the horizontal output at an acceptable frequency. If the supplied horizontal pulses are out of lock range or not present at all, the picture won't lock but no damage will occur. >