Steve Smith wrote: > In a moment of wild abandon a party piece was conceived :- > > THE DECIMAL CLOCK > .... > The problem arises when the ability to convert or count in > conventional time as well is also required. The conversion factor > for the seconds count [2.314815 "decimal" seconds to each "normal" > second] is not good 'easy' math's Sure it is, Steve... To convert from decimal seconds to normal seconds, multiply by 54 then divide by 125. -Andy === Andrew Warren - fastfwd@ix.netcom.com === Fast Forward Engineering - Vista, California === http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/2499 === For PICLIST help (including "unsubscribe" instructions), === put the single word "help" in the body of a message and === send it to: listserv@mitvma.mit.edu