> Please show we a PIC using fuzzy logic that does a control application better > than a classical control circuit. Classical control systems have been in > existence since the 1800's. They are not inherently unstable and they do not > operate poorly. PID is unlikely to be replaced by fuzzy. Proving that fuzzy is good does not prove that PID is bad. Fuzzy is another tool for problem solving. It can be used to solve non-linear control problems very well. There is an example in Circuit Cellar a couple years ago of a home environment control system that used the 16C74 as a controller for both air conditioning and heat. This controller treated time as a fuzzy input and suggested a variety of ways to add green rules to minimize energy usage. The fuzzy control rules in this sytem follows; FUZZY room_control { IF room IS cold THEN ac IS OFF heat IS ON IF room IS normal THEN ac IS OFF heat IS OFF IF room IS hot THEN ac IS ON heat IS OFF IF room IS cold AND hours IS morning THEN heat IS OFF IF room IS cold AND OutsideTemp IS hot THEN heat IS OFF IF room IS hot AND OutsideTemp IS cold THEN ac IS OFF } > The cruise control in your car is a good example. My cruise control > works great, operates smoothly, is safe, stable and uses classical > control systems. The cruise control on many cars use either fuzzy or setpoint tables a few use PID and deal with the changing mass problem with additional parameters. > > If you are interested in a critical view, view the URL below. Bob Pease, the > author of Pease Porridge, tackles some Fuzzy control systems. http://www.national.com/rap/Application/0,1127,25,00.html Bob Pease regularily acknowledges that fuzzy is well suited to non-linear systems. I have worked with both types of control systems. Given a problem in the future I will happily use which ever is appropriate. Fuzzy logic has added lingustic variables to the tools that we can use. Walter Banks