On Sat, 2 Aug 1997 03:11:06 -0400 Mike wrote,

______________Orignal Message_________________

At 05:35 PM 8/1/97 -0600, you wrote:
>Sadly not, as Microchip are still in 16-bit land and Windows CE
requires
>Win32 apps. Additionally, MPLAB would need to be recompiled for each
>different vendor processor type.
>
>When will the world move away from 16-bit apps? Who last bought a copy
of
>Windows 3.1?
>
>Peter S

What makes you think 32 bit apps are more efficient ?

Windows 95 is 95% 16 bit drivers and libraries most of which is ported
over from win 3.11.

there is a lot of propoganda and hype Win NT comes close to be a 32 bit
app
but even that uses 16 bit dlls !

rdgs

mike
_________________________


Caught on the Web :

>Webster's Dictionary definition of Windows95:
>
>Windows95: <win-doz-nin-te-fiv> n.
>   32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an
>   8 bit operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor,
>   written by a 2 bit company, that can't stand 1 bit of competition.


--

CarryOn

Rajnish.


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com