Shane Nelson wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to create a nice library of
> subroutines,
> but when reusing them I find it a pain
> to have to
> go through all the EQU's, to make sure
> I'm not already
> using those locations in another part of
> my program.
>
> My question: is it possible to have the
> compiler
> dynamically allocate memory in some way?
>
> ie)
> Instead of having to do this:
>
> COUNT   equ     h'7'
> ACCA    equ     h'8'
> ;16bit
> ACCB    equ     h'9'
> ACCD    equ     h'a'
>
> I want to be able to get away with
> something more like this:
>
> db = define byte
> dw = define word
>
> db      COUNT
> dw      ACCA
> db      ACCB
> db      ACCD
>
> -----
>
> Then, instead of hard coding variables
> it could just use the
> next available space.
>
> Thanks in advance.
> -Shane.

Why don't you define the last couple  of
RAM addresses as local variables.
Ie:
local1 equ 2f
local2 equ 2e
etc

Using the SET command to equate your local
(library) variables to those global ones.
Ie:
count set local1
acca set local2

--
Eric van Es               | Cape Town,
South-Africa
Mailto:vanes@ilink.nis.za | WWW:
http://www.nis.za/~vanes/
TEMPORARY/HOLIDAY ACCOMMODATION?
http://www.nis.za/~vanes/accom.htm