>> I've documented a lot of the behavior of the CCS stuff that I
>> didn't like to the people at CCS. .... I have yet to see a
>> mis-evaluation; in every case that I haven't seen what I expect,
>> the compiler is operating as designed. Sometimes it follows the
>> original K&R style, and sometimes the behavior is related to the
>> implementation.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Is K&R style of such mythic quality that it deserves to be mixed with other
styles?  I think not.  Kernighan and Ritchie wrote such brainy,
intellectually motivated, nitpicky specifications that if you mix anything
else with their style, you're going to be gotten.  Be a purist, or find or
create everyman's yacc output that will satisfy like a Chesterfield.

And stop whining.

JG