Received: from prometheus.microchip.com by alterdial.UU.NET with SMTP
        (peer crosschecked as: PROMETHEUS.MICROCHIP.COM [198.175.253.66])
        id QQcgbx03625; Sun, 9 Mar 1997 01:17:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: by prometheus.microchip.com; id AA25620; Sat, 8 Mar 97 23:15:21 MST
Received: from loghost(172.16.1.20) by prometheus.microchip.com via smap
 (V3.1.1)
        id xma025618; Sat, 8 Mar 97 23:14:54 -0700
Received: from chccm2.microchip.com (chccm2.Microchip.COM [172.16.245.42]) by
 titan.Microchip.COM (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id XAA03590 for
 <mail12706@POP.NET>; Sat, 8 Mar 1997 23:14:52 -0700
Received: from ccMail by chccm2.microchip.com
  (IMA Internet Exchange 2.1 Enterprise) id 00000D2C; Sat, 8 Mar 97 23:15:43
 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 1997 23:13:22 -0700
Message-Id: <00000D2C.1332@ccmail.microchip.com>
From: Hub.Admin@ccmail.microchip.com (Administrator)
Subject: Message not deliverable
To: "mail12706@pop.net" <mail12706@POP.NET>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: cc:Mail note part

> Meyer's Patent really has nothing to do with the gas, since it is not
> Brown's Gas.  Try Brown's patents.  In addition, the method of
> accelerating Brown's Gas output is outlined in the Puharich patent NOT
> the Meyer patent, nor any of the Meyer patents. Actually, Meyer
> highlights the wrong principles, sorry.