Received: from prometheus.microchip.com by alterdial.UU.NET with SMTP
        (peer crosschecked as: PROMETHEUS.MICROCHIP.COM [198.175.253.66])
        id QQcgbu25559; Sun, 9 Mar 1997 00:39:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: by prometheus.microchip.com; id AA25526; Sat, 8 Mar 97 22:38:20 MST
Received: from loghost(172.16.1.20) by prometheus.microchip.com via smap
 (V3.1.1)
        id xma025522; Sat, 8 Mar 97 22:37:59 -0700
Received: from chccm2.microchip.com (chccm2.Microchip.COM [172.16.245.42]) by
 titan.Microchip.COM (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id WAA03411 for
 <mail12706@POP.NET>; Sat, 8 Mar 1997 22:37:57 -0700
Received: from ccMail by chccm2.microchip.com
  (IMA Internet Exchange 2.1 Enterprise) id 00000D1E; Sat, 8 Mar 97 22:39:45
 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 1997 22:37:39 -0700
Message-Id: <00000D1E.1332@ccmail.microchip.com>
From: Hub.Admin@ccmail.microchip.com (Administrator)
Subject: Message not deliverable
To: "mail12706@pop.net" <mail12706@POP.NET>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: cc:Mail note part

Meyer's Patent really has nothing to do with the gas, since it is not
Brown's Gas.  Try Brown's patents.  In addition, the method of
accelerating Brown's Gas output is outlined in the Puharich patent NOT
the Meyer patent, nor any of the Meyer patents. Actually, Meyer
highlights the wrong principles, sorry.