Bob Blick wrote: > I also hear that interrupt-on-change will miss interrupts. It's good > for a keyboard wakeup-from-sleep and not much else. Yes, this is true for many of the 16Cxx parts... The newest ones have allegedly been fixed, but I haven't verified this. > Does Andrew Warren have something on his "answers" page about this? > I think so. Yeah, he does. It's the answer to Question #88, in the "Microchip PIC" section of his "Answers" page. > If you read the Microchip data sheets _very_carefully_ they > actually say so, too. In the newest data books, you don't even have to read carefully... Microchip have been nice enough to put a shaded block around the applicable paragraph. -Andy === Andrew Warren - fastfwd@ix.netcom.com === Fast Forward Engineering - Vista, California === === Custodian of the PICLIST Fund -- For more info, see: === http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/2499/fund.html