In message  <00002C8F.1332@ccmail.microchip.com> PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU writes:
>      The things that we have done to the code protection are all towards
>      the goal of having the most secure device possible.
>
>      Unfortunately, there is no where near enough volume in windowed JW
>      parts to justify doing seperate silicon for those.  So, the price for
>      protection is the loss of an occasional JW device.
>

Nor would we (I) want seperate silicon. It is useful knowing
that we use the same silicon in production - no wories about
different silicon bugs.


Regards,


Mike Watson