> Bummer, I've reprogrammed my 508 JW parts about 4 times already 8-(.
>
> >the FAE stated that I should read the last location 1FF or
> >3FF before I use the chip for the first time and then embedd this number in
> >the source code so it will be the same each time.

Heh... why can't Microchip take the metalization covering the code-protect
fuse and move it over a little bit so it covers the last ROM location inst-
ead? :-)  Their suggestion of putting that type of thing in the source code
is a recipe for confusion or disaster when the user goes to burn an OTP, and
is just about useless for people who use more than one window part (I like to
use three: at least one in the eraser, the one I'm testing, and the last one
I've just tested (so if something suddenly stops working, I can plug it back
in and see whether I broke something in the software or whether I broke some-
thing in the hardware while handling the board).