At 02:08 AM 9/13/96 -0600, you wrote:
>At 07:08 AM 9/12/96 -0400, you wrote:
>>CUT..
>>
>>I've collected a few cracking methods that have been posted here and the
>>electronics news group, that I'll post or E-mail as requested. I havn't
>>tried them. I dont think its wise to choose ignorance of evil. Do you trust
>>your competition to do likewise? I thought so.
>>
>>CUT..
>        I will like to recive it either direct or posted here in the list,
>maybe this security issue will be a long one, so let's Open it once for all
>and it will be finished sooner than if small things continue Confusing a lot
>of people, like now.
>

You could do better than asking me by dregding up what people have been
saying for the last few years, so:

1)      Use the "INFO REFCARD" command in a mail message body to
"listserv@mitvma.mit.edu"
        and find out how to search the list digest or archive for relevant
postings.

2)      Use "DeJa News" or AltaVista, or whatever to search relavant news
group archives.

3)      Write Microchip asking them to either fix the holes or state their
protection is not secure.

You will find more information as I only collected enough info to become
convinced the C84 and most processors are not secure. But I will mail you or
whomever my 30K tid-bit info file I collected.