Does anyone know if the 16C74A fixes this?

     -Ed V.


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: 16c74 using BRGH=1
Author:  liebchen@ffo.fgan.de at InterNet
Date:    9/12/96 3:58 AM


Alexej Vladimirov wrote:
> =

>  P> I am using the 16c74 with BRGH=3D1, and after extensive network tes=
ts
>  P> have concluded that for my application the error rates are vanishin=
gly
>  P> small.
> =

> Below is list of silicons, checked by me. I will be glad, if some PICLI=
ST
> users check their PIC16C65//65A/73/73A/74/74A/74ME micros with external=
 loopback
>  and BRGH=3D1 (send to PIC from PC, loopback in PIC, receive by PC and =
compare, as
>  in my test) to clear up situation with current silicon revisions.
> =

> Work without errors:
> - PIC16C74/JW 9508 CAT
> =

> Work with errors:
> - PIC16C74 ENG SMP 9430 CAT Rev A2
> - PIC16C74 ENG SMP 9502 CAT Rev A2
> - PIC16C74/JW 9524 SAT
> - PIC16C74ME A2 BOND 9443 CAA - Emulator pod
> =


Has Microchip a comment to these investigations?
Could they explain to us, what the nature of the
BRGH=3D1 problem is.
Maybe, some of us can decide, to use it or not.

regards

Wolfram

-- =


+------------------------------------------------+
! Wolfram Liebchen, Forschungsinstitut f=FCr Optik !
! mailto:liebchen@ffo.fgan.de                    !
+------------------------------------------------+