Alexej Vladimirov wrote:
> 
>  P> I am using the 16c74 with BRGH=1, and after extensive network tests
>  P> have concluded that for my application the error rates are vanishingly
>  P> small.
> 
> Below is list of silicons, checked by me. I will be glad, if some PICLIST
> users check their PIC16C65//65A/73/73A/74/74A/74ME micros with external loopback
>  and BRGH=1 (send to PIC from PC, loopback in PIC, receive by PC and compare, as
>  in my test) to clear up situation with current silicon revisions.
> 
> Work without errors:
> - PIC16C74/JW 9508 CAT
> 
> Work with errors:
> - PIC16C74 ENG SMP 9430 CAT Rev A2
> - PIC16C74 ENG SMP 9502 CAT Rev A2
> - PIC16C74/JW 9524 SAT
> - PIC16C74ME A2 BOND 9443 CAA - Emulator pod
> 

Has Microchip a comment to these investigations?
Could they explain to us, what the nature of the
BRGH=1 problem is.
Maybe, some of us can decide, to use it or not.

regards

Wolfram

-- 

+------------------------------------------------+
! Wolfram Liebchen, Forschungsinstitut fŸr Optik !
! mailto:liebchen@ffo.fgan.de                    !
+------------------------------------------------+