>> Shure would be nice to have more members in the 16c84 line.
>>
>> I wonder if other people feel the same and if any will comment
>> on possible new chips on the way?
>
>
>I have always thought tht the C84 should have been called the C81
>(like the C61 and C71) then the C83 would be a 28 pin device
>like the C73 and the C84 would then be a 40 pin device like the
>C74. All implemented in EEProm.
>
>To start with, a 28 pin version of the C84 would be very sweet.
>
>
>
>Mike
>

I don't know if this originally made it to the PICLIST or not. Occasional,
somewhere along the line, the "reply to" address is changed to the "sender"
address in stuff sent from the PICLIST. I don't know if the PICLIST itself
does this or if it is something screwed up at my service provider's end.

Anyway, my $0.02 worth (again?)


There is also the 16CR83 in the same vain as the 16CR84 but more
interestingly, if I read the press release correctly, the PIC12000
family WILL HAVE EEPROM and FLASH EPROM varieties.

The event of FLASH EPROM is a major change in direction for the PICs after
Microchip tried to convince as they did not have access to flash technology
and wouldn't buy it in.

Looking forward to this! :-)


Jim