Dewey Davis <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU> wrote:

> I wonder why the 16C65 isn't in the new simulator?  I suppose I can
> make progress using the 16C64 environment for awhile.

Dewey:

Use the 16C74 environment instead; it's much more similar to the
16C65 than is the 16C64.

-Andy

Andrew Warren - fastfwd@ix.netcom.com
Fast Forward Engineering, Vista, California
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/2499