PETE KLAMMER <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU> wrote:

> Code-protection must also defeat another mechanism: incremental
> bit-burning. ....  The code-protect fuse should prevent this (does
> it?).

Not on the first 64 bytes of the original 16C5x parts, Pete.

-Andy

Andrew Warren - fastfwd@ix.netcom.com
Fast Forward Engineering, Vista, California
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/2499