At 04:04 PM 5/3/96 -0500, you wrote:
>At 02:56 PM 5/3/96 -0500, you wrote:
>>On Fri, 3 May 1996, David E. Queen wrote:
>>
>>> So, is it generally accepted that a newbee like me would be better off
>learing
>>> with MPASM? Does MPSAM work well with the ITU unit and does anyone use the
>> pair?
>>
>>I dunno, sounds like a religious issue.  :-)  Yes and yes.
>>
>>
>
>Well it is sort of a religious issue but there are good reasons to use
>MPASM.  Mainly since most people use it, code examples from the list can be
>used directly.  Also assembler help is easyer to find.  It runs as a Windows
>application not as a dos shell.  I am sure there are more but these are
>enough for me.  In fact the first one is enough for me.
>
>Norm
>
I guess there are no Windows 95 issues or you would have said something.