Shel Michaels <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU> wrote:

> Say, Andrew - I may have missed some of this thread since my mailer
> is periodically broken, but... In the 16C74 don't you find it
> necessary to do the following for the sake of completeness??

Shel:

Yes, the 16C74 context-saving code is a little more complicated.
However, the original title of this thread was "Interrupts on the
16C84".

-Andy

Andrew Warren - fastfwd@ix.netcom.com
Fast Forward Engineering, Vista, California
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/2499