Brian, > By the way, it is my job to specify the new PIC devices. So, if > there's a PIC you want.... > > Regards, Brian Boles. bboles@microchip.com We would very much appreciate a 16C84 with the A/D converters put back, or a 16C71 with EEPROM memory, if you like. Recently Alex Baker from Microchip UK, told me that the 84 is in fact selling very well, but despite this there were no plans for new EEPROM devices (!). The argument was that industry is only interested in EEPROM data memory and not in EEPROM program memory (so the latter could be OTP or EPROM). My own impression from talking to PIC users in industry and research is that we do find EEPROM useful for program memory. One application is that the processor is first programmed with a test routine. After the device has been tested, it is reprogrammed in situ with the production software. Even though EPROM could also be used, these would almost certainly be much more expensive (ceramic package, probably not surface mount). I know an argument against EEPROM is that it requires too much chip area, but surely this will not be a problem as technology improves (and you are able to use your new 0.6u process for the 16c84). There is no PIC in your current 16Cxx(x) series that integrates all of the features desirable for motor control. If you could fit the following in an 18-pin package, or at least a slimline package, here is a priority list of what I would like to have: 1. Small slimline package and EEPROM memory (1k words is OK) (like 16C84) 2. A/D converters (like 16C71) 3. hardware I2C (like 16C64) 4. hardware PWM (like 16C64) The above is very important. The following are good but not as important: 5. More registers and program memory. 6. D/A converter. Looking forward to my new processor. Could you tell me when it will be available? :-) Cheers, Martin Nilsson Swedish Institute of Computer Science E-mail: mn@sics.se Box 1263, S-164 28 Kista Fax: +46-8-751-7230 Sweden Tel: +46-8-752-1574